Monday, 8 August 2011
Thursday, 9 June 2011
Monday, 6 June 2011
Monday, 9 May 2011
Dateline NBC May9 2011
See the similarities between the Sean Goldman kidnapping to Brazil and the Christopher and William Ko kidnapping to Singapore on Dateline NBC May9 2011
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/42956156#42956156
1) The father David Goldman was denied visitation with his son repeatedly. Yuxin Mei Wang denied visitation 5 times.
2) Sean's mother and her family poisoned Sean to hurt David.
3) After the return of Sean, legal actions continue without regard to the welfare and best interests of the child.
A new twist, Yuxin Mei Wang is now trying to get her US Permanent Residency back. She would not have lost her US PR if she did not kidnap the boys in the first place.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/42956156#42956156
1) The father David Goldman was denied visitation with his son repeatedly. Yuxin Mei Wang denied visitation 5 times.
2) Sean's mother and her family poisoned Sean to hurt David.
3) After the return of Sean, legal actions continue without regard to the welfare and best interests of the child.
A new twist, Yuxin Mei Wang is now trying to get her US Permanent Residency back. She would not have lost her US PR if she did not kidnap the boys in the first place.
Sunday, 1 May 2011
Why Did Yuxin Mei Wang Kidnap Her Children?
According to Dr. Dierdre C. Rand, there could be a few reasons. She wrote in her paper titled "The Spectrum of Parental Alienation" published in the American Journal of Forensic Psychology, Volume 15, Number 1, 1997:
1) "Need to Conceal Parental Deficits." "...the campaign to alienate the child from the other parent is sometimes used to deflect unwanted scrutiny of the programming parent's personal problems.... Sometimes parents engage in PAS (Parental Alienation Syndrome) behavior out of fear that they will be found wanting when compared to the more loving and capable target."
2) Parental Child Abductors. "An abducting parent views the child's needs as secondary to the parental agenda which is to provoke, agitate, control, attack or psychologically torture the other parent. It should come as not suprise, then, that post-divorce parental abduction is considered a serious form of child abuse."
3) "Need for Control and Domination." Some alienating parents are driven by overriding needs for power, influence, dominatoin and control. Engaging in PAS may provide the dual gratification of maintaining power, influence, and control over the child and vicariously over the ex-spouse whose visitation and relationship with the child is frustrated by the alienating parent's control maneuvers."
4) Personality Characteristics of Parents Making False Accusations of Abuse in Disputes. Mothers tend to present as "fearful victim," "justified vindicator...." "The fearful victim presenation involves manipulation of social image around a specific theme to which others respond with sympathy and support, such as child abuse or spousal abuse."
This is certainly true. Her entire family believed the abuse story. So did the teachers at Sembawang Primary School.
"When abuse is alleged, anyone in a position of authority can act as a "validator," including therapists, police, child protecton workers, ....Validators are professionsls who, when presented with allegations of abuse, assume that abuse occured. They see their role as validating the alleged abuse rather than conducting an objective investigation." This is a good description of the dumbo-heads at the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services. They had to re-investigate and paid me over US$3200 for damages for their error. I guess teachers and journalists are not far behind.
"Validators are relatively easy to find, especially when sought out by a parent seeking to strengthen their position in legal proceedings." And to gain sympathy.
5) The Delusional Parent. The children were subject to undue influence to get them to accept the accusing parent's psychotic belief and concomitant rejection of the other parent....
1) "Need to Conceal Parental Deficits." "...the campaign to alienate the child from the other parent is sometimes used to deflect unwanted scrutiny of the programming parent's personal problems.... Sometimes parents engage in PAS (Parental Alienation Syndrome) behavior out of fear that they will be found wanting when compared to the more loving and capable target."
2) Parental Child Abductors. "An abducting parent views the child's needs as secondary to the parental agenda which is to provoke, agitate, control, attack or psychologically torture the other parent. It should come as not suprise, then, that post-divorce parental abduction is considered a serious form of child abuse."
3) "Need for Control and Domination." Some alienating parents are driven by overriding needs for power, influence, dominatoin and control. Engaging in PAS may provide the dual gratification of maintaining power, influence, and control over the child and vicariously over the ex-spouse whose visitation and relationship with the child is frustrated by the alienating parent's control maneuvers."
4) Personality Characteristics of Parents Making False Accusations of Abuse in Disputes. Mothers tend to present as "fearful victim," "justified vindicator...." "The fearful victim presenation involves manipulation of social image around a specific theme to which others respond with sympathy and support, such as child abuse or spousal abuse."
This is certainly true. Her entire family believed the abuse story. So did the teachers at Sembawang Primary School.
"When abuse is alleged, anyone in a position of authority can act as a "validator," including therapists, police, child protecton workers, ....Validators are professionsls who, when presented with allegations of abuse, assume that abuse occured. They see their role as validating the alleged abuse rather than conducting an objective investigation." This is a good description of the dumbo-heads at the Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services. They had to re-investigate and paid me over US$3200 for damages for their error. I guess teachers and journalists are not far behind.
"Validators are relatively easy to find, especially when sought out by a parent seeking to strengthen their position in legal proceedings." And to gain sympathy.
5) The Delusional Parent. The children were subject to undue influence to get them to accept the accusing parent's psychotic belief and concomitant rejection of the other parent....
Tuesday, 12 April 2011
Another Work of Fiction
Raymond Yeo sent the letter below, claiming "our client had made the necessary arrangements for the children to travel to the US on their Singapore passports...." If this was true, why didn't Singapore Airlines check the children onto the flight on Tue March 15th at Changi Airport?
The actual truth is as follows which is documented in the SQ system and witnessed by many who were at the SQ Check-In Counter at Changi Airport:
1) Yeo's client Yuxin Mei Wang purchased 1 way tickets for the children to the US
2) An invalid US Passport number was provided to the travel agent and entered into the Singapore Airlines system
3) Wang did not obtain approval via ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) that is required when entering the US from Visa Waiver countries such as Singapore. Here is the link to ESTA: http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1990.html
4) Singapore Airlines could not check the children onto the flight because the children only had one-way tickets and did not have ESTA approval to enter the US on Singapore passports.
Raymond, I ask you, how is this considered "made the necessary arrangements for the children to travel to the US on their Singapore passports?" Please answer this question.
If the "necessary arrangements" were made, the children would have been allowed to board the flight. Wouldn't you agree?
Wang would probably not have been able to purchase one-way tickets from the Singapore Airlines Service Center if she only showed a Singapore passports. SQ would know the rules better than the "imaginery" immigration attorney Wang consulted. That is how an invalid US passport number was provided to SQ and was in fact in the SQ system at Changi Airport.
Work of Fiction from Raymond Yeo Apr12 2011
The actual truth is as follows which is documented in the SQ system and witnessed by many who were at the SQ Check-In Counter at Changi Airport:
1) Yeo's client Yuxin Mei Wang purchased 1 way tickets for the children to the US
2) An invalid US Passport number was provided to the travel agent and entered into the Singapore Airlines system
3) Wang did not obtain approval via ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) that is required when entering the US from Visa Waiver countries such as Singapore. Here is the link to ESTA: http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1990.html
4) Singapore Airlines could not check the children onto the flight because the children only had one-way tickets and did not have ESTA approval to enter the US on Singapore passports.
Raymond, I ask you, how is this considered "made the necessary arrangements for the children to travel to the US on their Singapore passports?" Please answer this question.
If the "necessary arrangements" were made, the children would have been allowed to board the flight. Wouldn't you agree?
Wang would probably not have been able to purchase one-way tickets from the Singapore Airlines Service Center if she only showed a Singapore passports. SQ would know the rules better than the "imaginery" immigration attorney Wang consulted. That is how an invalid US passport number was provided to SQ and was in fact in the SQ system at Changi Airport.
Work of Fiction from Raymond Yeo Apr12 2011
Sunday, 10 April 2011
Why did Yuxin Mei Wang abduct her children?
One psychologist offered that "An abducting parent views the child's needs as secondary to the parental agenda which is to provoke, agitate, control, attack or psychologically torture the other parent. It should come as no surprise, then, that post-divorce parental abduction is considered a serious form of child abuse." according to Dr. Deirdre C Rand: The Spectrum of Parental Alienation Syndrome, American Journal of Forensic Psychology 1997: Volume 15, Number 3 and Number 4. Wang recently filed an Affidavit in the US where she said the divorce dragged on for 3 years. It did indeed because she and her attorney refused to settle. Three (3) offers of settlement was offered so that we can focus on the wellbeing of the children but she refused. It was discovered in February 2008 that Wang was not divorced from her previous husband. In August 2008, the final offer of settlement was made which included a sum of money to be paid to her. Similar to the recent case in Singapore, a bigamous marriage is void from day-1 and there is no community property. Yet Wang still refused to settle where she could walk away with a sum of money. Her "parental agenda" came first.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)