Another Work of Fiction

Raymond Yeo sent the letter below, claiming "our client had made the necessary arrangements for the children to travel to the US on their Singapore passports...." If this was true, why didn't Singapore Airlines check the children onto the flight on Tue March 15th at Changi Airport?

The actual truth is as follows which is documented in the SQ system and witnessed by many who were at the SQ Check-In Counter at Changi Airport:

1) Yeo's client Yuxin Mei Wang purchased 1 way tickets for the children to the US

2) An invalid US Passport number was provided to the travel agent and entered into the Singapore Airlines system

3) Wang did not obtain approval via ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization) that is required when entering the US from Visa Waiver countries such as Singapore. Here is the link to ESTA: http://travel.state.gov/visa/temp/without/without_1990.html

4) Singapore Airlines could not check the children onto the flight because the children only had one-way tickets and did not have ESTA approval to enter the US on Singapore passports.

Raymond, I ask you, how is this considered "made the necessary arrangements for the children to travel to the US on their Singapore passports?" Please answer this question.

If the "necessary arrangements" were made, the children would have been allowed to board the flight. Wouldn't you agree?

Wang would probably not have been able to purchase one-way tickets from the Singapore Airlines Service Center if she only showed a Singapore passports. SQ would know the rules better than the "imaginery" immigration attorney Wang consulted. That is how an invalid US passport number was provided to SQ and was in fact in the SQ system at Changi Airport.


Work of Fiction from Raymond Yeo Apr12 2011

Why did Yuxin Mei Wang abduct her children?

One psychologist offered that "An abducting parent views the child's needs as secondary to the parental agenda which is to provoke, agitate, control, attack or psychologically torture the other parent. It should come as no surprise, then, that post-divorce parental abduction is considered a serious form of child abuse." according to Dr. Deirdre C Rand: The Spectrum of Parental Alienation Syndrome, American Journal of Forensic Psychology 1997: Volume 15, Number 3 and Number 4. Wang recently filed an Affidavit in the US where she said the divorce dragged on for 3 years. It did indeed because she and her attorney refused to settle. Three (3) offers of settlement was offered so that we can focus on the wellbeing of the children but she refused. It was discovered in February 2008 that Wang was not divorced from her previous husband. In August 2008, the final offer of settlement was made which included a sum of money to be paid to her. Similar to the recent case in Singapore, a bigamous marriage is void from day-1 and there is no community property. Yet Wang still refused to settle where she could walk away with a sum of money. Her "parental agenda" came first.